Environmental Symposium Co-Chairs:
Environmental Symposium Peer Reviewers:
| Presentations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9:00am-9:25am | ENV01 | Alternative Performance-Based Strategies | |
| 9:30am-9:55am | ENV02 | Waste Contractor Assessment Strategy | |
| 10:00am-10:25am | *ENV03 | Landfill Gas Migration Assessment and Remediation Activities | |
| 10:30am-10:55am | ENV04 | Assessment of Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils Using Biological Assays | |
| 11:00am-11:25am | *ENV05 | Using the Risk Reduction Rules | |
| 1:00pm-1:25pm | ENV06 | Minimum Impact Manufacturing - Water Use Reduction | |
| 1:30pm-1:55pm | ENV07 | Reliability: Foundation for Success | |
| 2:00pm-2:25pm | Coffee Break - Visit the Open Technical Exchange Poster Session | ||
| 2:30pm-2:55pm | ENV08 | Parameter Identification in a Layered Aquifer System | |
| 3:00pm-3:25pm | ENV09 | ISO 14000 - The Future of Environmental Management | |
| 3:30pm-3:55pm | ENV10 | Treatability Test of a Stacked-Tray Air Stripper for VOCs in Water |
| Session Codes | ||
|---|---|---|
| *xxxnn | Both an oral presentation and a poster | |
| xxxPnn | Poster Only |
ENV01
Alternative Performance-Based Strategies
Adele D. Cardenas, PE, XL Coordinator, US Environmental Protection Agency
Friday, 9:00am–9:25am
EPA has developed a coordinated series of demonstration projects designed to provide
the opportunity to implement alternative management strategies for facilities, industrial
sectors, communities, and federal agencies. These projects provide environmental managers
the flexibility to employ technological innovation to achieve environmental goals beyond
what the law requires, while requiring accountability for performance. The Project XL
proposals encourage collaborative decision making with increased citizen involvement.
One of the agency's alternative performance based strategies is Project XL.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV02
Waste Contractor Assessment Strategy
Debbie Furness, Hazardous Materials Engineer, Caterpillar Inc.
Friday, 9:30am-9:55am
Industry has been increasingly concerned with the contractors who provide for the disposal of hazardous, non-hazardous, and special wastes. An organization assumes all of the liability, present and future, associated with any waste it generates, regardless of the manner in which a contractor disposes of that waste. It is of critical importance to ensure that an organization's contractors are operating in an ethical manner and complying with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.
Many of the sites listed on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) have not been
"traditional" RCRA permitted waste handling operations. Businesses that provide for the
recycling of scrap metal, glass, plastic, wood, paper, and other materials have been
appearing on the NPL in increasing numbers. Recyclers are not held to the stringent
reporting, permitting, and inspection requirements that are placed on RCRA permitted
facilities, and can create significant liability for a waste generator. This paper
will provide a guide for scheduling and performing waste contractor assessments.
I will be discussing tools that may be used in assessing any type of waste contractor,
including: 1) Financial Review, 2) Regulatory Compliance and Inspection History -
Internet Tools, 3) Audit Checklist Information.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
*ENV03
Landfill Gas Migration Assessment and Remediation Activities
Danielle Forget Shield, Environmental Engineer, Waste Management of Texas, Inc.
Richard Dormier, PE, Solid Waste Project Manager, RUST Environment and Infrastructure
Friday, 10:00am-10:25am
A pre-Subtitle D municipal solid waste landfill located in Houston, Texas began experiencing
methane gas detection in its permanent gas monitoring probes shortly after construction of
final cover on the sideslopes of the facility. The sidewall liner for the affected area
of the landfill consists of insitu soils with a soil-bentonite slurry wall cutoff to
underlying clays. Shortly after the initial methane detection, a gas collection and
flaring system was designed and installed. This system has sporadically controlled the
gas migration from the facility. The site has performed a site assessment to determine
the cause of the continued methane gas detection. The assessment included a review of
site geology and hydrogeology, historic filling patterns at the facility, and effective
radius of influence of the gas collection wells. Several remedial actions have been
taken by the facility including removal of leachate from gas wells, placement of
additional collection wells, looping of the gas collection header, and installation
of a larger blower and flare.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV04
Assessment of Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils Using Biological Assays
Ann Saterbak, PhD, Associate Research Engineer, Shell Development Company,
Westhollow Technology Center
Robin J. Toy, Environmental Advisor, Shell Chemicals Europe
Bruce C. McMain, Research Technician, Shell Development Company
M. Patty Williams, Technical Associate, Shell Development Company
Friday, 10:30am-10:55am
The management of sites which contain hydrocarbon-impacted soils is a wide-spread
problem in the United States. Assessments and remediation plans which rely solely
on chemical assays of the petroleum hydrocarbon in soil have been found, in some
cases, to not accurately predict risks to human health and the environment. To
understand the impact of hydrocarbons on the terrestrial ecosystem, biological
assays including earthworm survival and reproduction and seed germination and root
development for four different plant species were developed. Eight
hydrocarbon-contaminated field soils were tested using the described biological
assays and many chemical and physical assays. A range of species specific responses
which differed among the soils was observed. The soils were then actively biotreated
in the laboratory for one year, during which time chemical and biological assays were
used to monitor changes. Increased earthworm survival and seed germination and
declining hydrocarbon concentrations were observed for most soils during treatment.
Correlations between the biological and chemical measurements are explored. Case
studies which apply both chemical and biological assays to assess the impact of
hydrocarbons on the soil environment in a cost-effective, tiered framework are discussed.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
*ENV05
Using the Risk Reduction Rules
Laura J. Gimpelson, PE, Chief Engineer, LG Environmental Engineering
Friday, 11:00am–11:25am
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) published the Risk Reduction Rules (30 TAC 335, Subpart R) in 1993 to simplify the remediation of impacted land and groundwater when using RCRA and CERCLA regulations. Other divisions such as the PST and Volunteer Cleanup Program also established risk based rules for closure of impacted sites. These rules established remediation goals that were based on the use of risk assessment techniques and allowed for remediation of soils and groundwater to chemical concentrations above site-specific background levels that are protective of human health and the environment. The default concentrations listed in various TNRCC regulatory guidance documents (RGs) were calculated using the exposure equations developed for Superfund cleanups. Generally, the default values were consistent with an increase exposure rate equal to or less than 1 in a million increase in cancer cases and a 1 in 100,000 increase in non-cancerous illness in site employees, visitors, and adjacent neighbors.
I have used the Risk Reduction Rules (RRS) to establish cleanup levels for closure at
industrial and commercial facilities throughout Texas. Often I have been the first to
use specific rules and procedures to achieve closure. The three case studies I am
presenting today reflect the history and future of risk based closure (RBCA) in Texas.
They include one of the first sites closed under the RRS as well as use of the proposed
multiprogram risk assessment guidelines. I will discuss some of the technical and
political hurdles that must be jumped to receive TNRCC approval to close the site under
the risk reduction rules.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV06
Minimum Impact Manufacturing - Water Use Reduction
Mari Chesser, Environmental Engineer, Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Research and Development
Friday, 1:00pm–1:25pm
Minimum impact manufacturing (MIM) can be defined as operating mills that produce quality products while continuing to reduce adverse effects on the environment. MIM is a cornerstone of Weyerhaeuser's corporate vision. MIM is a journey. The incremental steps are aligned with evolving longer-term need of our stakeholders: customers, employees, communities, suppliers and shareholders.
Steps on the MIM journey are evaluated against four basic criteria: 1) Economic viability, 2) Environmental benefit, 3) Customer requirements, including both functional product characteristics and environmental parameters, and 4) Alignment with public values.
Minimizing water use, or mill close-up, is an important part of MIM. Pulp and paper
mills are complex, multi-process facilities with many process streams and recycle streams,
all with widely varying flow and quality characteristics. These facilities have been
large users of fresh water in comparison to other manufacturing industries. Historically,
pulp mills were built beside rivers or streams which provided process water and a
convenient means of waste disposal. As concerns for improved environmental protection
have increased, reduction and elimination of discharges of effluent to receiving waters
has received significant attention. By understanding and evaluating what has been done,
what is being done, and what could be done in the industry, innovation in water closure
can lead to an economic and competitive advantage. This presentation will discuss
various water reduction opportunities being investigated and implemented by Weyerhaeuser.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV07
Reliability: Foundation for Success
Wayne Long, PE, Reliability and Quality Leader,
Salt Mining/Underground Storage/Pipeline, The Dow Chemical Company, The Dow Pipeline Company
Friday, 1:30pm–1:55pm
RAM is no longer an acronym just for random access memory. Now it also stands for Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability. Availability is based on reliability and maintainability. If equipment is not available, it cannot operate. These concepts are not new, but they comprise a growing and emerging field of technology. Reliability influences performance in many areas including safety, environmental, quality, productivity, economic profit, and risk assessment. By influencing these areas reliability influences overall business success. Optimization of reliability is critical - you cannot afford too much, but you cannot afford not to have enough.
This presentation will provide a basic understanding of reliability, availability,
maintainability, and associated concepts, such as utilization and failure, and how
these concepts interrelate. Factors which affect RAM will be considered. Both
qualitative and quantitative representations of RAM concepts will be discussed.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV08
Parameter Identification in a Layered Aquifer System
Pamela G. Anderson, HVJ Associates, Inc.
Friday, 2:30pm–2:55pm
In groundwater modeling, standard analytical solutions assume that the aquifer parameters and the amount of flow into or out of the aquifer are known. These analytical solution techniques then solve for drawdown at some distance from the pumping well. Results from field testing of an aquifer consist of the pumping rate and the drawdown at some distance from the pumping well. Inverse analysis consists of using the field data to back compute the aquifer parameters.
Inverse analysis of aquifer parameters has been typically performed using
trial-and-error methods. The complexity of these analyses increases with the number
of layers in the system. In addition, flowmeter data has been shown to be an excellent
source of layer information, but cannot be used to infer storage properties. This
research assembled a package of computer programs to evaluate characteristic parameters
for a multilayer aquifer system using data obtained from pumping and flowmeter tests
and from observations in nearby wells. The LAPIS package consists of a groundwater
modeling program and an optimizing program. Testing of the package showed good
agreement with analytical solutions. Analysis of actual field data showed the use
of flowmeter data could provide valuable additional information in the parameter analysis
of a multilayer system. The parameters are modified in a logical, systematic approach,
thereby automating and improving the analysis.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV09
ISO 14000 - The Future of Environmental Management
Megan V. Oemke, PE, Project Engineer, NTH Consultants, Ltd.
Friday, 3:00pm–3:25pm
With the finalization of the ISO 14000 standards in 1996, and the globalization of many businesses, the coming months are an advantageous time to institute environmental management systems at a range of facilities, including industrial manufacturing complexes and municipalities.
An environmental management system (EMS) can take many forms. An EMS based on the internationally recognized ISO 14000 series of standards is most likely the first choice for companies competing in the global marketplace. The ISO 14000 series are a voluntary set of standards that are intended to assist facilities in developing and implementing an EMS based on continuous improvement. The ISO 14001 standard describes specific requirements for a continuous improvement EMS.
The ISO 14000 series of standards have been described as being ISO 9000 standards for
environmental issues. While there are some similarities, this is not entirely correct.
Implementing an ISO 9000 system caused many companies to generate enormous amounts of
paperwork and procedures specifically for the ISO 9000 system. However, it is likely
that an environmentally compliant facility has a portion of the elements of an ISO 14001
system in place, thereby minimizing EMS development and implementation costs.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENV10
Treatability Test of a Stacked-Tray Air Stripper for VOCs in Water
Tristan M. Pico, Environmental Engineer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Friday, 3:30pm–3:55pm
With the finalization of the ISO 14000 standards in 1996, and the globalization of many businesses, the coming months are an advantageous time to institute environmental management systems at a range of facilities, including industrial manufacturing complexes and municipalities.
An environmental management system (EMS) can take many forms. An EMS based on the internationally recognized ISO 14000 series of standards is most likely the first choice for companies competing in the global marketplace. The ISO 14000 series are a voluntary set of standards that are intended to assist facilities in developing and implementing an EMS based on continuous improvement. The ISO 14001 standard describes specific requirements for a continuous improvement EMS.
The ISO 14000 series of standards have been described as being ISO 9000 standards for
environmental issues. While there are some similarities, this is not entirely correct.
Implementing an ISO 9000 system caused many companies to generate enormous amounts of
paperwork and procedures specifically for the ISO 9000 system. However, it is likely
that an environmentally compliant facility has a portion of the elements of an ISO
14001 system in place, thereby minimizing EMS development and implementation costs.
| Top of Page | Other Links |
ENVP01 - Withdrawn
| Top of Page |